Home › Forums › Exams and revision › 2021 Section B Q9a › Reply To: 2021 Section B Q9a

Thank you Barbara and Colin prompt responses.

I think it really depends on how you view the equation or how you derive it. There are two very distinctive approaches.

———————-

Method 1.

Just using definition of a= dv/dt and v=ds/dt

a=dv/dt

= dv/ds * ds/dt

a= v * dv/ds

a ds= v dv

then integrate both sides by putting when s=0, v=u and when s=s v=vwe will have as = 1/2 v^2 -1/2 u^2

————————–

Method 2.

Work = force * distance

dW = F* ds (in here, the * means the vector dot product)

input work = output work. (conservation of energy)

Gravitational energy = work done to the particle with mass m.

(mg) * ds = F *ds

= ma *ds

= m (dv/dt) * ds

= m dv* (ds/dt)

= m v * dv

The left hand side is just mgh.

Canceled the m from both sides, this will also result in exactly the same equation.

—————–

Please note in the method 2, mg and s are in vector form. Although the vector acceleration a in method 1 is not clear for the track, I still can use g as the acceleration and h as displacement. But as Barbara mentioned, it really doesn’t matter as g will always parallel to h.

The first approach used the definition of a and v. The result from method 1 is totally just a mathematical results of manipulation of symbols and chain rule.

Method 2 showed the conservation of energy that KE = Force* distance in different form.

==========

That is why I puzzled about the examiner report which regarded students using v^2=u^2 +2as is wrong. In my opinion, this kinematic equation or KE=PE are just the same.

Man